“We can’t teach reading with an eye toward social justice if we don’t address both the equity issues and some strategies for working with the students who need the most support.” (Bomer & Bomer, p. 89)
Struggling Readers -- “People who, for one reason or another, misapprehended the reading process and have not put a reading system together that adds up to meaning; these are struggling readers.” (p. 89)

The current education system and society as a whole, relies so heavily on competition and is results-based, meritocratic. Struggling readers, or struggling (name something), begin to see themselves negatively. Eliminating or at least mitigating tacit conclusions students draw as they compare themselves to other students.
When students begin to compare themselves with other students around them – adults do this too – there is significant chance that the students struggling can gain a negative idea about themselves. They can lose confidence and self-worth and they are likely to become embarrassed, nervous, disengaged… their eyes duck down, pleading in their head the teacher not call on them, ensuring not to make eye contact. They feel small, want to be invisible. They feel they are behind…EVERYONE. They may feel they are not smart, something is wrong with them… that they “are not the kind of person who reads” (Bomer & Bomer, p. 91).  How do/can we ensure we to lift up our students rather than allowing them to go down this path?


“This measuring of self against others may be unavoidable in our society, but if reading is taught realistically, in all its diversity, the comparisons need not be this detrimental” (p. 90).

Investigating ourselves as readers opens up conversations – shared inquiry.

Bomer and Bomer suggest using short sessions where all students engage in reading books they find difficult – that they have difficulty finding meaning – to help drive home the realization and understanding within the entire community of students that everyone will and does struggle at some point, in one way or another, as a reader. Bomer and Bomer insist that we, as teachers, must make these sessions brief. If not, frustration sets in for everyone when reading at a “frustration level” (p. 90), and the sense of enjoyment in reading fades for everyone. In large/lengthy doses this could potentially have lasting, undesirable affects as these negative feelings and experience could overtake the positives for those students not necessarily struggling. The goal is to have an open and honest discourse about the struggles of reading, talking about the difficulties each student feels as a reader, enlighten the “whole community to the realization that these struggles are not a function of intelligence, ability, or age” (p. 90), all the while not having the students in need of support feel as though they are being “singled out”, tracked, or grouped by ability. So, how long is long enough? And how do we know and ensure we do not push the students too far?   

Choosing the “Just Right” Books; Developing independent reading agendas; and Building Libraries to Support the Most Vulnerable Readers  

Finding books that best fit struggling readers is essential to their development as readers. If we can find books that suit our struggling readers’ level, we can provide them with necessary boost in confidence, self-worth, and a positive experience with reading. The more positive experience, the more they enjoy to read.   
In cases, developing an independent reading agenda may be necessary. This involves much extra time, thought, and effort -- is it possible for a few students? Several students?

Building libraries -- "In many classrooms, in fact in many schools, books easy enough for struggling readers to get through successfully just aren't there. This is unfair, and it reproduces too-common injustices in the society at large. Money for books is one of the resources schools and teachers must allocate with an eye toward justice. if there is an imbalance, it should be in favor of the most vulnerable, NOT against them. It is hypocritical to attempt to teach for social justice wand democracy without having enough easy books available to struggling readers." (Bomer & Bomer, p. 90).

** What if we don't have any help from the school? How do we build our Libraries to support our most vulnerable readers without breaking the bank?! What are some ideas?

 “If we do not pay attention to how we work with these students, we run the risk of ignoring them entirely, thus setting up conditions in which only some students will benefit. The students already richest in reading capital will get richer while the poor get poorer. In so doing, we would reproduce the unjust callousness toward the vulnerable of the larger society – and of course, very often they are the same people.” (p.89)

Strategies:

Scheduling conferences during reading workshops
Reading and reporting meaning as it evolves throughout a text -- breaking texts into manageable sections, then having the student read a section, report what he/she read, and repeating.

The teacher is involved, guiding the student’s thinking through conversation – allowing the student to process what he/she has read and engage in conversation, thinking aloud, having access to and instant feedback through the teacher’s questioning and thinking. This drives the students to actively engage in the sense making process.  
Parents, family members, and volunteers:
The importance of building relationships with student’s families once again makes an appearance! If we do not have a relationship with our student’s family, if we are not in communication with them and do not know them, how could we possibly know what kinds of reading they do with the student outside of class and how the student preforms at home (or in a setting outside school)? How could we possibly ask them if they could spend a little time working with the student on reading, without sounding condescending? We cannot!

Building those relationships and having frequent communication with parents, guardians, and/or family members allows us to understand the circumstances, the child’s reading habits outside of school, and allows us the opportunity to ask if there is a possibility for a little reading work outside of the classroom and suggested areas/skills/etc. to work on with the student. Similarly it provides the parents, guardians, and/or family members a better understanding of where the child is at and what the child needs work on. Also, this allows for more open and honest dialogue from both/all parties. Then if we learn the parent(s)/guardian/family member is unable to attend to the child’s reading need because of the long hours spent at work to provide for the family – rather than the full responsibility falling on the parents/family/guardians to do so, we can search for volunteers to work with the student.



Establishing and maintaining a classroom community – creating a safe, engaging, and supportive environment for ALL readers!

Do you believe this is possible/realistic in the current system we have? How do we create such a community – ideas, strategies, etc.? How would you introduce this idea to your students?

As we discussed in Dr. O’s class, the concept of community and collaborative learning isn’t necessarily instilled within students, as the system and prior classroom experiences stresses competition. Thus, we must establish and teach our students how to engage in respectful, helpful, positive, supportive, collaborative learning. Instilling the sense of community and togetherness is essential before we can implement / put in to practice the concept of working together. We must show before we do – if we implement this before the students understand why and how, the results might have the opposite results for what we intend.  

** Do you have any ideas for how to setup a lesson where we have stronger readers helping more vulnerable readers? What kinds of lessons plan ideas do you have for matching up powerful readers with more vulnerable readers?

  




*** What are some other strategies/ideas we have learned about in other classes to help struggling readers? OR some strategies/ideas that you have for helping struggling readers? How about struggling writers?

** How can we utilize writing to help struggling readers and vice versa? What about if a student struggles in both?


Struggling Writers:

 “Rubrics, and their “menu” of generic comments, are clumsy in practice and in theory; they tear at the foundations of the rhetorical heart of writing, reducing student essays and our responses to an exercise in purposelessness.” (Wilson, 2007, p.63).




“While a small amount of standardization is necessary for communication, readers and writers depend on the evocative, associative qualities of language to make reading an intensely meaningful, personal experience. I sometimes wonder if dictionaries have done us a grave disservice; they perpetuate the delusion that words can be defined rather than described, imagined, experienced, and conveyed” (Wilson, p.63).



Human Response > Rubric


 




“When we give up rubrics, we’re looking at student’s work through our eyes, not those of the rubric. Unmediated by the rubric, our responses gives students the power to think through what effect they want their words to have rather than how their words measure up to the categories on a rubric.” (Wilson, p. 64).  


This sounds fantastic, and this fits my personality, as I don’t necessarily enjoy following strict guidelines. But giving up the rubric and assessing student’s work in this manner could be difficult for some –Can you see yourself being able to give up a rubric or similar assessment tools and to assess student’s writing by this approach? Does it suit your personality? Do you believe it would be difficult or easy for you to pass on using a rubric and use this human response approach?   

As with many of the other approaches, ideas, methods, and so on we have read about, implementing the human response approach for assessing student’s writing would certainly take extra time and effort on our part as the teacher. How do we juggle our time efficiently and effectively enough to use this approach in our classrooms?


This Ted Talk revolves more specifically around School to Prison Pipeline, but the social injustices and the equity issues I believe are relevant here.
*********
References:
Bomer, R., & Bomer, K. (2001). For a better world: Reading and writing for social action. Heinemann, 88 Post Road West, PO Box 5007, Westport, CT 06881. (Chapter 5).
Rios, V. (n.d.). Transcript of "Help for kids the education system ignores". Retrieved from 
https://www.ted.com/talks/victor_rios_help_for_kids_the_education_system_ignores/transcript?referrer=playlist-blueprints_for_the_next_genera&language=en
Wilson, M. (2007). Why I won't be using rubrics to respond to students' writing. English Journal, 62-66.



Comments

  1. Thanks for your post, Austin. You brought up so many good questions. You asked, ‘How do/can we ensure we lift up our students?’ I think it is really important to have a classroom atmosphere that is not overly competitive. It is human nature to compare ourselves and our progress to others, but, like you pointed out, that can be harmful. If we strive to help students focus on their growth instead of their score, it can help. In classrooms I’ve seen reading logs where children track their reading level from month to month. This allows them to visually see how much they’ve grown (and there is almost always growth). If they enter the class at reading level B and within 5 months they’ve reached reading level J, that is good progress regardless of whether they are ‘on grade level’ or not. We’ve also talked about this in math. Timed tests can be considered harmful because they promote comparisons between the people able to finish and the people who can’t finish. But, as we discussed, they can be used if the student works, not against a timer, but against a stopwatch with the goal of beating their own ‘score’ each time.

    You also asked, ‘Do you have any ideas for how to set up a lesson where we have stronger readers helping more vulnerable readers?’ I’ve been in classrooms that had a partner system for some tasks that involved reading. One teacher in particular would pair her slower, less independent readers with the strongest readers in the class. I think it worked for her and her students because she had set up expectations that the strong reader was not supposed to do all the work. In order to successfully have strong readers pair with (and actually help) vulnerable readers, the strong reader must understand that it is still a paired activity. They aren’t supposed to just tell the answers to their partner. I’ve also seen teachers pair English Language Learners with strong readers who also speak the same native language. This seems to make the newly arrived students feel more comfortable and ensures they are still understanding the content.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the response! I really like your thoughts regarding striving "to help students focus on their growth instead of their score, it can help. In classrooms I’ve seen reading logs where children track their reading level from month to month. This allows them to visually see how much they’ve grown (and there is almost always growth)." To make sure, the student is responsible for tracking his/her own progress? I really like this idea, as it encourages the students to take control of their own learning and they are driving their own learning toward by outdoing self. Like you said, using, " Timed tests can be considered harmful because they promote comparisons between the people able to finish and the people who can’t finish. But, as we discussed, they can be used if the student works, not against a timer, but against a stopwatch with the goal of beating their own ‘score’ each time." We all do it constantly, with games on our phone, running to beat our time, golf, etc.. to improve and beat our best score/time. This drives people to put in the time, so bring that into the classroom would certainly be a great option. I think we need to make sure we do stay cognizant of students progress, best times, etc. In that if the student has a rough week or so and don't see this improvement, they do not get discouraged/ frustrated!
      Thanks again, I appreciated the examples you have seen in classrooms! Those are a huge help!

      Delete
    2. Austin, Thank you for your wonderful post. Rachel, I was recently in a classroom that was doing a book club. The students had selected the book club they wanted to join ( they were able to pick from 6 different book clubs within the classroom) and had reading assignments during class time. The group that I was working with was made up of a diverse reading leave of 6 students. It was great to watch the stronger readers answer the questions from the assignment, pause and wait for the other students to exchange their thoughts. The teacher had developed a "classroom community as a whole can provide a safe and supportive environment for struggling readers" ( Bomer, p. 91) This is a book club model i would love to duplicate in my classroom.

      Delete
  2. Great post Austin! Your quote from Wilson “When we give up rubrics, we’re looking at student’s work through our eyes, not those of the rubric. Unmediated by the rubric, our responses gives students the power to think through what effect they want their words to have rather than how their words measure up to the categories on a rubric.” (Wilson, p. 64). And your response "This sounds fantastic, and this fits my personality, as I don’t necessarily enjoy following strict guidelines. But giving up the rubric and assessing student’s work in this manner could be difficult for some –Can you see yourself being able to give up a rubric or similar assessment tools and to assess student’s writing by this approach? Does it suit your personality? Do you believe it would be difficult or easy for you to pass on using a rubric and use this human response approach?" really caught my attention. Like you, I was thinking this sounds great. I felt like rubrics trapped a lot of my thinking. But I also had questions like you did. Assessing student's writing can be difficult for teachers who don't have a writing background. Not all teachers themselves are the strongest writers, and giving thorough and beneficial feedback can be difficult without a rubric. For me personally, I believe I could give up a rubric and use a human response approach. I would rather give suggestions or some other guideline for writing depending on the topic or assignment. But I know I'm not like everyone else, and that some teachers may feel less comfortable giving up a rubric depending on their writing backgrounds or personality.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your response, Will! "I felt like rubrics trapped a lot of my thinking. Assessing student's writing can be difficult for teachers who don't have a writing background. Not all teachers themselves are the strongest writers, and giving thorough and beneficial feedback can be difficult without a rubric." This is a great point. If the teacher is not the strongest writer and not necessarily confident in his/her abilities to assess and provide immediate feedback without a rubric, then using a rubric would be logical, right? However, you got me thinking, what if that same teacher wanted to use a human response type method... what type of guidelines or more flexible assessment tool might he/she develop -- to have a blueprint/ guide/fall back, without it being so rigid that it "trapped" his/her thinking? A combination of a assessment tool to guide/support the teacher in order to help her/him provide better quality feedback, but not rigid in that it becomes used specifically for or as the only thing on which the feedback to the student is based. I think that speaks to your idea that you " would rather give suggestions or some other guideline for writing depending on the topic or assignment."

      Finding that balance and what works for each of us and best for our students.. maybe the ..find and create a rubric and stick with it approach would work for some, but I think reflecting on self, using trial and error, creating/ maintaining and refining our guidelines /tools, and searching for new ideas from variety of sources continuously is essential and would ultimately provide much better quality, effectiveness, and results for us and for our students.

      Delete
  3. Great post Austin! I love your memes (some of them are pretty hilarious) and I think you bring up a lot of really great questions. I think your question about how we are supposed to create safe, engaging, and supportive environments for our students is a really difficult one to answer. But I definitely think it begins by having conversations and creating dialogue in the classroom so that students begin to learn about the people around them and us as the teacher. I think it believes listening to them, and doing a lot of "homework" about the community we will be teaching in to understand the kinds of texts we can try to bring into the classroom. I really like the idea of trying to establish an environment where we can lift up our students to support developing readers. And I really like Rachel's example of classrooms that include a partner system, and if we do establish a safe environment in our classrooms, that only increases the possibility that our students will feel supported enough to learn through their peers.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Struggling with the Struggle

Appreciative feedback > standardized rubrics

Engaging African American Boys in Reading